How big a threat is state sponsored computer hacking




















Often the sensitive nature of data being held by a third party may not be fully appreciated or the company may not consider itself a target of nation states. Wherever possible, state-sponsored actors will use standard attack methodologies used by other typical cyber-crime actors and penetration testers. These usually involve targeted phishing emails followed by use of recent, known exploits the victim may not have gotten around to patching.

When they have a foothold, actors often move laterally into share servers and other systems where they can steal privileged credentials. From there they:. Only when a company is highly mature in its security posture, is a high value target, and generic attacks fail, will they resort to using costly 0-day malware developed internally. The majority of organizations find out about a cyber-security attacks because someone else told them about it. Most types of attack are often visible in a short period of time, whether hacktivism, financially motivated, or opportunistic.

He said they may leave less fingerprints behind them as they undertake less overt attacks, such as extracting cryptographic secrets or API keys for present or future campaigns. Click here to join the free and open Startup Showcase event. Security study finds a few best practices can have a big impact on threat protection.

Alleged state-sponsored hackers target Log4j vulnerability as fears of a worm emerge. Join the community that includes Amazon Web Services and Amazon. How did we do? FireEye has also played a key role in identifying Russia as the lead actor in numerous hackings, though the company did not comment on specifically who might be responsible this time. An investigation into the attack has been launched in coordination with the FBI and others including Microsoft, which has its own cybersecurity team.

Mr Mandia said the hackers used "a novel combination of techniques not witnessed by us or our partners in the past" but that FireEye had so far seen no evidence that any attacker has used the stolen red-team tools. The company said it had developed more than countermeasures for its customers to use in order to minimise the potential impact of the theft of the tools. Whether or not customer data was accessed, it's still a big win for Russia. It is not clear exactly when the hack initially took place, but a person familiar with the events told the agency FireEye had been resetting user passwords over the past two weeks.

The stolen computer kit targets vulnerabilities in popular software products, but Mr Mandia said none of the stolen tools exploited so-called "zero-day vulnerabilities", meaning the relevant flaws should already be in the public domain. The hack was the most significant breach of a major cybersecurity firm since when a mysterious group known as the "Shadow Brokers" released high-level hacking tools stolen from the National Security Agency.

North Korea and Russia were suspected of having used that stolen information to launch devastating global cyberattacks. Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism. Rob Lee, a director with computer investigations firm Mandiant says he's never seen a Mac compromised during his investigations. They simply aren't targets because they aren't widely used in the enterprise customers that Mandiant typically investigates, he said Wednesday.

In fact, when a customer comes to Mandiant after its been hacked, Lee often recommends that executives go out and buy a Macintosh so that they can continue to do company business with less risk of re-infection.

Security experts at Black Hat this week agree that these targeted hacking attacks are unparalleled and extremely widespread. On Tuesday, McAfee released a report saying that it had uncovered evidence of a sophisticated hacking operation that had broken into systems at more than 70 companies over the past five years.

With Macs becoming increasingly popular in the corporate world, IT staffers should at least be thinking of how they'd do in an APT attack, according to Stamos. That's why his company did the research. Follow Robert on Twitter at bobmcmillan.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000