Prefer the language keyword for local variables, method parameters, and class members, instead of the type name, for types that have a keyword to represent them.
Prefer the language keyword for member access expressions, instead of the type name, for types that have a keyword to represent them. The style rules in this section concern modifier preferences, including requiring accessibility modifiers, specifying the desired modifier sort order, and requiring the read-only modifier. The style rules in this section concern parentheses preferences, including the use of parentheses for arithmetic, relational, and other binary operators.
The style rules in this section concern expression-level preferences, including the use of object initializers, collection initializers, explicit or inferred tuple names, and inferred anonymous types. Prefer using a null check with pattern-matching over object. The style rules in this section concern the use of the var keyword versus an explicit type in a variable declaration.
This rule can be applied separately to built-in types, when the type is apparent, and elsewhere. Prefer var is used to declare variables with built-in system types such as int.
Prefer var when the type is already mentioned on the right-hand side of a declaration expression. Prefer var over explicit type in all cases, unless overridden by another code style rule. The style rules in this section concern the use of expression-bodied members when the logic consists of a single expression. This rule can be applied to methods, constructors, operators, properties, indexers, and accessors.
The style rules in this section concern the use of pattern matching in C. Prefer pattern matching instead of as expressions with null checks to determine if something is of a particular type. Toggle navigation Microsoft Lance's Whiteboard. Goals and objectives: Cover all major C Language features. Only provide rules where there is a clear cut best practice. Lead developers to a "pit of success" and avoid common "pits of failure" Release Notes:.
Added numeric datatype usage guidelines. Adjusted guidelines for public, protected, and internal access modifiers. Tweaked verbage throughout document. Thanks for the assist Conrad. Sorry, you are correct Kirk it should be BCL. My bad. Don't use hungarian notation. It is a relic, and has no place in an object oriented language. Oded Oded k 96 96 gold badges silver badges bronze badges. Hungarian notation still has some uses, for instance you could use dirty and clean prefixes to represent data before and after validation so there is never any confusion about what you are dealing with.
That does not deserve a downvote IMO. Can the downvote please explain? If you disagree, please add your thoughts.
Hungarian notation can be useful in situations where one might have multiple identifiers which are very strongly associated with each other, but which need to be distinct.
The relationship between. Conrad Frix Vadim Vadim There are a few convention rules to follow. Here are some simple examples: Private members fields They are often seen to start with an underscore character, or the small 'm' letter followed by an underscore.
It only takes a minute to sign up. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. What coding standards do you think are important for. This could be anything from dealing with curly braces and spacing and pedantry like that. Or it could be more fundamental questions such as what namespaces in the. NET Framework to avoid, best practices with config files, etc.
Try to avoid creating a post that is simply the corollary to another. For example, it would be fine to have one post focusing on curly braces. We don't need two to support one style vs. The idea is not to vote for your pet standard, but rather to flesh out what should be thought about when creating standards. Here is the official Microsoft Guide on coding standards for the.
NET framework Version 4. If you want the older version for 1. I don't necessarily follow this to a 'T', as they say. However, when in doubt, this is the best place to start to be consistent with the current. NET framework, which makes it easier on everyone, no matter if they're new to your particular project or not. Might want to take a look at StyleCop. You can even incorporate it into some build systems so that style errors will break the build. The default settings are mostly congruent with what MS suggests for guidelines as posted by others.
Start with FxCop. It will tell you about best practices violations in your existing code. I'm using the following applications to maintain a coding standard besides camelback rules, method name and etc.
GhostDoc - Adds a auto-generated comment on the top each method. The application provides good inital summary of method. I hate established coding standards, they're all concerned with either telling you not to make a few silly mistakes, or telling you how to format your code in some way or another.
0コメント